Becerra, D. (2017). Uso de simulaciones en la enseñanza de conceptos generales de electricidad y magnetismo en estudiantes de ingeniería (Tesis de doctorado). Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México.

Benítez, Y. (2012). Una clase demostrativa interactiva para la enseñanza de la caída libre de los cuerpos (Tesis de doctorado). Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México.

Bonwell, Ch. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom (Higher Education Report No. 1). Estados Unidos: ASHE-ERIC.

Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.

Breslow, L. (septiembre-octubre de 1999). New Research Points to the Importance of Using Active Learning in the Classroom. TLL Library, 13(1). Recuperado de http://web.mit.edu/tll/tll-library/teach-talk/new-research.html

Cazau, P. (2007), Psicología del aprendizaje. Buenos Aires: Biblioteca Red Psicología.

Cummings, K., Marx, J., Thornton, R., & Kuhl, D. (1999). Evaluating Innovation in Studio Physics. American Journal of Physics, 67(7), S38.

Dellwo, D. R. (junio de 2010). Course Assessment Using Multi-Stage Pre/Post Testing and the Components of Normalized Change. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 55-67.

Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., & Dietz, E. J. (1998). A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. V. Comparisons with Traditionally-Taught Students. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 469-480. Recuperado de https://www.engr.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/drive/1Jq9l3hhrIfO2_cRA7Pmw-L6mrOv4oY9N/1998-Long5.pdf

Garduño, L. (2010). Implementación de clases demostrativas interactivas para la enseñanza de caída libre en el bachillerato (Tesis de maestría). Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México.

Greca, I., & Moreira, M. (1998). Modelos mentales y aprendizaje de física en electricidad y magnetismo. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 16(2), 289-303.

Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-Engagement versus Traditional Methods: A Six-
Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.

Hake, R. (2007). Six Lessons from the Physics Education Reform Effort. Latin-American Journal Physics Education, 1(1), 24-31.

Hovland, C. I., Lumsdaine, A. A., & Sheffield, F. D. (1949). The Baseline for Measurement of Percentage Change. En Experiments on mass communication (pp. 284-292). Nueva Jersey: Universidad de Princeton.

icpe, & iupap (octubre de 2008). Resolution on the Importance of Active Learning and Hands-on Physics Education. International Newsletter on Physics Education, 56.

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood, Nueva Jersey: Ablex.

McDermott, L. C. (2001). Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: “Physics Education Research: The Key to Student Learning”. American Journal of Physics, 69(11), 1127.

Maloney D., O’Kuna T. L., Hieggelke C. J. & Heuvelen A. V., (2001). Conceptual Survey in Electricity. American Journal of Physics, Education Research, 69, 12-23.

Mazzolini, Alexander P. (2002). Using Lecture Demonstrations and On-line Discussion Groups to Enhance Learning in a Photonics and Fibre Optics Unit (Conferencia presentada en la VII International Conference on Education and Training in Optics and Photonics). Proceedings of SPIE, 4588 (A. Tuan-Kay Lim, & H. Guenther, Eds.).

Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The Relationship Between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: A Possible “Hidden Variable” in Diagnostic Pretest Scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259.

Muñiz, J. (1997). Introducción a la teoría de respuesta a los ítems. Madrid: Pirámide.

Ogborn, J. (2008). A Future for Modelling in Science Education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 6(2),103-112.

Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Universidad de Chicago.

Redish, E. F. (1999). Millikan Award Lecture (1998): Building a Science of Teaching Physics. American Journal of Physics, 67(7), 562-573.

Redish, E. F. (2003). A Theoretical Framework for Physics Education Research: Modeling Student Thinking. Recuperado de http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0411149.

Redish, E. F., Scherr, R. E., & Tuminaro, J. (2006), Reverse-Engineering the Solution of a “Simple” Physics Problem: Why Learning Physics Is Harder than It Looks. The Physics Teacher, 44(5), 293-300.

Ross, S. M. (2004). Introduction to Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists. : Nueva York: Elsevier Academic.

Sandoval, M. (2009). Aprendizaje activo del campo eléctrico en estudiantes de ingeniería (Tesis de doctorado). Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México.

Seyed, A. (2013). A Study About How Students Are Able to Analyse Mechanics Situation Using Newton’s Laws (Tesis de doctorado). Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México.

Sokoloff, D. (2006). Active Learning in Optics and Photonics. París: unesco.

Sokoloff, D., Thornton R., & Laws, P. (2007). Real Time Physics: Active Learning Labs Transforming the Introductory Laboratory. European Journal of Physics, 28(3), S83-S94.

Stathopoulou, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2007). Exploring the Relationship Between Physics-Related Epistemological Beliefs and Physics Understanding. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 255-281.

Suskie, L. (2004). Assessing Student Learning: A Common-Sense Guide. Nueva York: Jossey-Bass.

Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. (1990). Learning Motion Concepts Using Real-Time Microcomputer-Based Laboratory Tools. American Journal of Physics, 58(9), 858-867.

Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). Assessing Students Learning of Newton’s Laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66(4), 338-351.

Tristan López, A. (1998). Análisis de Rasch para todos. México: Instituto de Evaluación e Ingeniería Avanzada.

Vázquez, B., & Rúa, A. (2007). Actividades manipulativas para el aprendizaje de la física. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 43(7), 1-15.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Universidad de Harvard.

White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing Understanding. Nueva York: The Falmer.

Wu, M., Tam, H. P, & Jen, T.-H. (2016). Educational Measurement for Applied Researchers: Theory into Practice. Singapur: Springer.